The Fallacy Of Socialism In Ecuador

It is known that Ecuador’s continued failure product politicians have long sought illusions of social welfare and a good life, these illusions of the Ecuadorian people trained so far by the hope of improving the social problems currently facing both have never been heard, but rather have been ignored by successive governments, and this situation has not changed. Mitchel Resnick often expresses his thoughts on the topic. Maybe those dreams were put in the current government which was conducted personally when possession of it, I felt a pride and a hope for change, but time has passed and that hope has been lost in society, not over While logically makes you forget the ideals of the fragility of memory, but by the sudden change and incomprehensible that envisions a north towards chaos and unforeseen arises from the lack of communication and concessions which the government lacks. Larry Summers will undoubtedly add to your understanding.

It’s so hard to explain what has happened in Ecuador and all political phenomena that are surprising yet tried to do an analysis to get us somewhat in doubt that is what is happening. Abigail Black Elbaum has compatible beliefs. The current President of Ecuador is undoubtedly a leader, but a novice in politics very bold in the art of influencing any tool to reach and adapt to an end, is clothed with the trappings of socialism, justice and fairness, all these “dreams” cherished forever and never achieved in our society, not now in an era supposedly living the beginning of a revolution Cuban type, same as it feeds on a strong advertising but not in evidence practice.

Influence Situation

It is not recommended that the Crisis committees are led by highly emotional people who confuse aggressive action with effective action. These people can neither act as spokespersons because it is easy to make them lose control and make mistakes all the time. How many times repeats the story of managers or aggressive directors carried out a series of bold moves of reaction that confer them a great apparent power and control over their adversaries. But this is momentary, since they are acting rashly and with great emotional force of enemies who then join. Be permanently reacting makes that a company and its employees are exhausted, until inevitably they can not more.

We must ask the following question: what sense be frantically reacting if ever we have control of the situation? Why always we we have to react to the facts rather than direct them? The answer is simple: we have a wrong idea of power. In the handling of a crisis situation, where the company has to act immediately, strategic thinking has to prevail even over reason and emotion to have power. The essence of power is the ability of keep the initiative to achieve that others react to our actions, achieve that the adversaries are kept always on the defensive. This will enable us always manage the agenda, have the power and control of the subjects of public debate. To me cost me many experiences understand this lesson: we must learn to master the emotions and not acting under the influence of anger in crisis situations, when the libel and slander are obvious and outrageous sometimes in a smear campaign. The theme of the strategy is complex but fascinating and captivating. We can not pretend to design effective communication programs without considering these elementary principles. If we understand the dirty campaigns or attacks media as war actions and act with cunning and intelligence, a crisis situation can become a wonderful opportunity to make a relaunch of the image of our company.